Introduction:
The Roland Rubix24 audio interface promises a compact solution for musicians and producers. Let’s dive into the details to see if it lives up to the expectations.
Design and Build:
- Sleek and compact design
- Sturdy metal chassis
- Convenient layout for easy access to controls
- Rubberized base for stability
The Rubix24 has a thoughtful design, offering a balance between portability and durability. The metal chassis ensures longevity, while the well-organized layout provides easy access to essential controls.
Connectivity:
- Two combo inputs with phantom power
- MIDI input/output
- Hi-Z switch for instrument inputs
- Headphone output with dedicated volume control
The Rubix24 is a flexible and handy tool that can be used for different things because it can connect in many ways. It has two inputs that work for both microphones and instruments. Also, it has a MIDI i/o to connect with more devices. The Hi-Z switch is useful for directly plugging in instruments, and there’s a special headphone output for better listening.
Audio Quality:
- 24-bit/192kHz resolution
- Low-latency performance
- Clean and transparent preamps
- Wide dynamic range
Delivering on its promise of good audio, the Rubix24 boasts impressive specs. The 24-bit/192kHz resolution ensures clarity, and the low-latency performance is crucial for real-time recording. The preamps maintain a clean and transparent signal, offering a wide dynamic range for diverse recording scenarios.
User-Friendly Interface:
- Simple LED indicators
- Direct monitor control
- Plug-and-play setup
- Compatible with major DAWs
Using the Rubix24 is easy because it has a clear interface. The LED lights give clear signals, and the direct monitor control makes it simple to monitor while recording. It’s also easy to set up since it works well with popular recording programs, reducing any setup difficulties.
Software Integration:
- Bundled with Ableton Live Lite
- Compatible with Roland’s own production software
- Driver stability for smooth operation
Including Ableton Live Lite with the Rubix24 enhances its value because it gives you a powerful tool for creating music. This software pairs nicely with Roland’s production program, making the Rubix24 even more flexible. Plus, the dependable drivers make sure it operates smoothly, with less risk of any program issues.
Pros:
- Compact and durable design
- Versatile connectivity options
- High-quality audio performance
- User-friendly
- Software bundle adds value
Cons:
- Limited to two combo inputs
- No loopback feature
- Slightly expensive
Conclusion:
In summary, the Roland Rubix24 is a dependable audio device that’s small, has lots of useful features, and sounds really good. Although it doesn’t have a loopback feature and is a bit pricey, it’s a great choice for musicians and producers who want a portable and effective way to record music.
Tom –
High quality product for music / streaming to connect to a high end mic.
Could not give his a higher rating
Zero00 –
Todo perfecto con el equipo, pero no venia mi licencia de Ableton? Se puede saber por que?
Louis Castellucci –
I couldn’t be happier.
I’m running a Windows 10 Machine (RYZEN 1700X/VEGA 64). DAW is Bitwig.
No issues with installation, Bitwig recognized it no problem. I also am using the dedvices as a Midi In/Out and that works flawlessly as well. Delay is minimal in the headphones, sounds quality is excellent, and its easy to use. No complaints!!
Eliran Ben-Zikri –
I was looking to upgrade my audio interface and I’m very happy with it. been working with it for a month now, works like a charm – to me it feels better than the Focusrite ones for this price
Just Joe –
I record VO on a Sennheiser 416. This unit sounds great, very stable drivers on PC (Win7), good value. Only issues are it doesn’t come with the software interface that the Quad-Captures came with, making it very difficult to set precise levels. Also no compression with this model. So I will probably unload this and either get the Rubix 24 (for the hardware compression), or find another product that has software for precise level setting. Would prefer to stick with the Rolands as the sound is very good and they work very well on my rig; hopefully Roland will include the software in future releases so I don’t have to switch!
This is a good solution for a non-professional project studio if precise level setting is not a big issue. Unfortunately, without that software, this is more of a consumer-level product.
Matthew Dunphy –
After using an M-Audio interface well beyond its support window, it was time to get something new and reliable. I’ve honestly never been a big fan of certain segments of Roland’s offerings – Edirol always seemed overpriced and generic. This, however, hit the same price range as all the other boxes in its space, but offered a few more features, and honestly – looked better. Maybe I’ve been staring at their 80s synth and fx offerings too much lately, but the RUBIX designs look classy to me. Bought it, plugged it in, worked like a charm. I wouldn’t be surprised if we were still running this ten years later – assuming the rest of the world lasts that long.
don ward –
Had problems with the Behringer UMC404HD with Ableton Live so invested in the Rubix 44 and since then had no problems with compatibility, cracks/pops or latency. Good build quality and nice sound. Can’t compare to some of its competitors but would highly recommend and you certainly get what you pay for compared to cheaper alternatives… Making music is enjoyable again!! Thanks Roland!
LuckyLucy –
Roland Rubix22 USB Audio Interface, 2-In/2-Out
This is a desktop 2 in, 2 out USB Audio iface that supports your standard 24-bit/192kHz resolution. The unit shell is metal. Rock solid. In fact, when i opened this, i accidentally dropped it on concrete outside in my garage. I gasped. But other than a slight scratch on the corner, the product works just fine. So inadvertently I tested the robustness. Just to compare, similarly popular and priced Focusrite Solo, is metal housing to but theres a lot of plastic on the inner housing.
I’d like to compare this with my Focusrite Scarlett solo because its priced similarly and has similar features.
1. As mentioned, physical housing, Roland wins hands down. All metal shell . no plastic. Focusrite is metal but the inner bezel is all plastic. Drop test comparison , i’d easily put my bet on Roland. Having said that, the Roland is double the size and much heavier than Focusrite solo. This might be a factor for you if you plan to move around with it.
2. Both units support Direct monitoring but Roland’s has a Stereo/MONO switch in the back which is really nice. Stereo mode, youre input 1 and 2 are separated in left and right ears. Could come in handy in recording. Focusrite is just mono. Both units have really clean direct monitoring equally able to drive a decent set of monitor headphones.
3. Roland and Focusrite supports 24-bit/192kHz … both are excellent. Cant really complain about either .
4. Mic preamp with phantom power is present on both units but I will admit the focusrite preamp does seem to give a bit more gain to my Shure SM57. Both are pretty clean and hard to find much difference in recordings. But for my Shure mic, i use an inline cloudlifter preamp so i dont really have an issue with the slight difference
5. Roland unit comes with classic midi in/out ports. Focusrite doesnt.
6. Roland has a ground lift. EXCELLENT. Focusrite does not. I found this to be really helpful to get rid of hum especially for my setup. The hum is completely eliminated and direct monitoring is completely silent. even more silent than Focusrite which has no ground lift.
7. Focusrite now has an “air” button for the Mic input. Instant treble boost button basically. Actually grown to like having this switch , especially some times to brighten up SM57. Roland has no such switch. It will be missed. But you dont really need this for recordings since you can EQ. But for Live setting, That air button is really handy.
I’m super happy with This rubix22. It’s an excellent audio interface that in my opinion is superior to Focusrite Solo . I think it is superior to the Focusrite 2i2 as well since thats the bigger brother of Solo that doesnt really add much more . I can easily recommend this over the Focusrite.
Hope this helps!
Giustino Barletta –
Per le registrazioni in home studio è molto consigliabile!! Grazie Roland! Grazie Amazon!
troublef –
Which audio interface you get depends on a lot of personal things. This checked all the boxes for what I need (including MIDI in/out, which a lot of the others in this price range don’t have), and I was a little worried about latency issues since it doesn’t have the knob to mix input volume w/ DAW volume or whatever that’s called, but I haven’t had any issue with that at all so far.
This thing worked right out of the box (on Mac, so no drives needed), and I love it. I’ve been struggling figuring out a music workflow for years, and finally this + Ableton Live + an Arturia controller I’ve had forever and I’ve recorded almost twenty demos in a month. And having the ability to plug my bass or guitar directly into this and record DI is killer for quickly getting ideas out.
I couldn’t be happier. I’ll update this if I have latency issues in the future, but this box is so good.
TGH –
Writing a review after a year of use. Please do not buy this product. After a year of use i have started getting a hissing sound when i turn the gain of both the inputs to 3 o clock. This seems to be a manufacturing default and everyone are facing this . Roland has failed to fix this issue and it is almost impossible to reach their customer service. Seller is willing to check the unit but once a sound card becomes faulty it is impossible to fix it because even slight extra drop of solder will impact the recording. Not recommended to be purchased at all.
On a side note, if you are going to keep both levels at 12 o clock, it should work fine.
Tyv –
By far the best interface I have used. Look professional, great build quality, literally plug and play usability, thought you will probably get the best performance out of installing the Roland drivers from the website. Zero issues with my Dell XPS i9/Fl Studio. Massive upgrade from Line 6 UX2 and Focusrite, which were both plagued with driver issues and unreliability. If you have any doubts, dont! Get it! Now!
Damon Stillson –
After a few years of use, I only really have one bad thing to say about this product so I’ll state this first.
It was placed on my desk with me beside my MIDI keyboard and I found if you’re a gamer, and you tend to rage, or abuse your desk it may have potential to damage your interface.
A forceful slam on my desk made the headphone input lose audio in the right ear, so the headphone jack is a little less durable.
But on the bright side of things, I’d have to recommend this to anyone looking for an amazing interface for a mid range budget.
With a full metal casing, two ports for XLR and 1/4 inch cables, audio monitoring, phantom power, easy install, and easy plug in, how could I not recommend this?
As well as having 1/4 inch BALANCED TRS outputs in the back and two ways to power the device.
It’s very comprehensive, simplistic, yet a powerful little interface.
I’ve had no need to contact the support team with how easy going this interface is, and it reads directly into my DAW or OBS software after the driver setup.
It requires a little bit of tampering in your control panel to get it working inside of game chats, and Discord, Zoom, or the like.
Easy fix is the set it as your default device, and if it still doesn’t work, try another usb port on your motherboard.
Hope this helps! and happy recording!