As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. This post contains affiliate links.
The EW 112P G4 is a wireless lavalier kit built around one job: getting clean, reliable spoken-word audio into a camera or recorder when you can’t run a cable. What decides it for most buyers isn’t sound character — it’s the omnidirectional ME 2 lapel mic, the true-diversity receiver, and the fact that it’s an analog UHF system, which means you need to confirm the frequency band is legal and clear in your region before buying.
Comparing options? See our full roundup of the best wireless lavalier mics.
Get it if you’re a solo shooter, interviewer, documentary, or event videographer who wants a proven, camera-mountable system that just works. Look elsewhere if you need multi-channel scalability on a budget, or if you’d rather avoid RF coordination entirely — in which case a modern 2.4GHz digital clip-on system is simpler to run.
Quick comparison
| Aspect | Verdict |
|---|---|
| Best for | Solo video, interviews, run-and-gun and event work where you need a dependable single wireless lav channel on a camera or recorder. |
| Sound | Clean, natural voice reproduction from the omnidirectional ME 2 lav; tuned for speech rather than music, with the even pickup you expect from a broadcast-style lapel mic. |
| Build & reliability | Metal-bodied bodypack and receiver with true diversity reception, a long-trusted design in professional field use; camera-mountable receiver with a common battery setup. |
| Ease of use | Auto-frequency scan and IR sync make pairing straightforward, but it’s an analog UHF system, so you must pick a legal, interference-free band for your country. |
| Value | A premium price for a single channel, justified by RF reliability and support rather than raw feature count; digital rivals offer more channels or recording tricks for less. |
For example, G4 Sennheiser EW 112P Omni-directional Wireless Lavaliere System is useful to everyone. I suggest those interested to talk about it and understand why this ratio of qualities is possible, and what disadvantages the system still has.
I will say right away: this is a solution that focuses on shooting video. For example, journalists can use the system to record interviews. The device can be adapted for other tasks, but here the kit feels best. This is understandable by default, but still it is better to immediately indicate the scope.
The main idea is that the sound should match the video quality. During the video recording process, it often happens that the “picture” gets all the attention. But what’s the point in a quality image if the sound does not match the quality? The viewer will not compromise when every sound has to be caught, breaking through a curtain of outside noises.
Imagine a stand-up performance by a star, like Dylan Moran or Louis C.K., and the whole place of people who speak and shout. You see the star perfectly, but the comedy’s magic is broken. Here’s the same.
The problem is especially important in the era of online streams somewhere on the street. And the question of price arises. Budget counterparts of this model cost ridiculous money, but the sound quality is always mediocre.
I checked a lot of options, and I know what I’m talking about. I always try to find the best budget solutions in any category. Therefore, it is better to pay a little more but get a decent quality. And here the Sennheiser EW 112P G4 is simply good.
It is worth noting that Sennheiser sells several modifications of the system with almost identical names. This should be considered so as not to be confused. Always pay attention to the equipment.
Sennheiser EW 112P G3/G4-B omni-directional EW system review
Sennheiser EW 112P G3/G4-B Review
The Sennheiser EW 112P G3/G4-B is a top-notch wireless microphone…
In this case, the user will get a transmitter, a receiver, and a clip microphone:
- SK 100 G4;
- EK 100 G4;
- ME 2-II, respectively.
The devices are made of plastic, but the impact resistance is high. This is a reliable solution for regular and active use.
SK 100 G4 has a screw-type connector and the ability to quickly mute the sound using the “quick” button on the case. Protection against the accidental shutdown of the device is implemented in a simple but elegant way. The switch is located in a closed battery compartment (AA). The range is 100 meters with 8 hours of uninterrupted operation on one set of batteries.
The EK 100 G4 also has accessories for convenience: a belt loop and an adapter for cold shoes on the camcorder. TRS and XLR connectors are available. Frequency Range is 516-558 MHz.
Both devices are equipped with displays for basic operating information. Both have a red low battery indicator. Green indicators are also available: RF signal strength / incoming audio volume, respectively. That is, the appearance of the receiver and transmitter is almost identical at first glance.
But let’s move on to my practical notes.
What can you say right away about the features of using the kit?
Automatic connection is almost instant and easy. Additional configuration is not required at the same time, and the user can start work out of the box without preparation. However, other situations are possible. The user must be prepared for an overestimated default sound level, and it can be flexibly adjusted on a scale.
In general, the devices have a very flexible configuration, and any beginner will be able to achieve high quality and accuracy of sound from scratch. Professionals will also be happy, although here you do not dig deeper into the technical component. All for simplicity and practicality at the level of expert level needs: I would give such a slogan to the Sennheiser EW 112P G4.
I recorded in several rooms with outside noise. Of course, I’m talking about the natural background and not the jet engine on takeoff. The sound of speech is very clear, and it is not clouded by third-party interference. What you need in the context of the stated objectives of this set.
The distance range in theory works to the full declared length, but the dynamics of the workflow can create problems. In a reasonable state, everything works for sure.
Subsequently, it also became clear that the microphones from the configuration are capable of automatic gain normalization.
In general, this is a successful product at a price that may turn out to be a little expensive at first glance. In practice, everything will pay off.
Sennheiser EW 112P G4 review (Specifications & Features)
- Reporting and live stream device
- Receiver, transmitter and lapel microphone included
- Reliable and durable assembly of all elements of the kit
- Flexible sound volume adjustment
- Easy setup, including automatic setup options
- 100 m current wireless range
- Powered by AA batteries up to 8 hours of continuous operation
- Intelligent design to prevent accidental shutdowns
- Convenient screens on the receiver and transmitter to indicate basic operating information
FAQ
What’s the difference between the EW 112P G3 and G4? The G4 is the newer generation, with refinements to the receiver interface, tuning bandwidth and workflow features like faster sync and scanning. Both use the same ME 2 omnidirectional lav and the same core true-diversity, analog UHF approach, so audio character is very similar; the main practical differences are usability and the specific frequency ranges offered.
Is the EW 112P G4 legal to use where I live? Because it transmits on UHF, it’s sold in region-specific frequency bands, and some ranges require a licence or are restricted depending on your country. Always check the band designation (for example A, B, G, etc.) against your local RF regulations before buying, and pick a band that is both legal and clear in your area.
Should I choose this over a 2.4GHz digital system? Choose the G4 if you value proven UHF reliability, longer usable range in the right conditions, and a broadcast-style workflow. A 2.4GHz digital clip-on system is often smaller, licence-free worldwide, and easier for beginners, but can be more crowded in busy RF environments and typically offers a different feature set.
Can I use a handheld or headset mic with it? The 112P kit is a bodypack system with a locking 3.5mm connector, so you can swap the ME 2 for other compatible lavs or a compatible headset mic. If you need a handheld, Sennheiser offers handheld transmitter versions of the same series rather than adapting the bodypack.
Does it come with everything I need to record to a camera? The kit includes the bodypack transmitter, the camera-mountable receiver, the ME 2 lavalier and a cable to feed your camera or recorder. You’ll still want to supply batteries and confirm your camera’s input level and connector, and many users add a shock or clip solution for mounting.
Conclusion
Choose the EW 112P G4 when you need one dependable wireless lav channel for interviews, events and run-and-gun video, and you’re willing to pick a legal, clear UHF band for your region. It stands out as a reliable single-channel workhorse for solo shooters and documentary work; if you need multi-channel scaling or licence-free simplicity, weigh a modern digital system instead, and reserve the G4 for when RF reliability and a proven broadcast-style workflow matter most.